PART 2. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY
CHAPTER 67. STATE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS
SUBCHAPTER B. STATE REVIEW AND APPROVAL
The State Board of Education (SBOE) proposes new §67.43, concerning state review and approval of instructional materials. The new section would address the removal of a set of instructional materials from the lists of approved and rejected instructional materials outlined in Texas Education Code (TEC), §31.022.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION: TEC, Chapter 31, addresses instructional materials in public education and permits the SBOE to adopt rules for the adoption, requisition, distribution, care, use, and disposal of instructional materials. House Bill (HB) 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, significantly revised TEC, Chapter 31, including several provisions under SBOE authority. HB 1605 also added a new provision to TEC, Chapter 48, to provide additional funding to school districts and charter schools that adopt and implement SBOE-approved materials. In addition, the bill added requirements related to adoption of essential knowledge and skills in TEC, Chapter 28.
At the January-February meeting, the SBOE approved 19 TAC Chapter 67, State Review and Approval of Instructional Materials, Subchapter B, State Review and Approval, §67.21, Proclamations, Public Notice, and Requests for Instructional Materials for Review; §67.23, Requirements for Publisher Participation in Instructional Materials Review and Approval; and §67.25, Consideration and Approval of Instructional Materials by the State Board of Education, and Subchapter D, Duties of Publishers and Manufacturers, §67.81, Instructional Materials Contracts, and §67.83, Publisher Parent Portal, for second reading and final adoption. At that time, the board expressed a desire to clarify the rules related to the list of approved instructional materials outlined in TEC, §31.022.
Proposed new §67.43 would clarify the conditions under which the SBOE could remove instructional materials from the list of approved instructional materials as well as the list of rejected instructional materials. The proposed new section would also outline the timeline for these decisions and their impact on school district procurement.
The SBOE approved the proposed new section for first reading and filing authorization at its June 28, 2024 meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT: Todd Davis, associate commissioner for instructional strategy, has determined that for the first five years the proposal is in effect, there are no additional costs to state or local government, including school districts and open-enrollment charter schools, required to comply with the proposal.
LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT: The proposal has no effect on local economy; therefore, no local employment impact statement is required under Texas Government Code, §2001.022.
SMALL BUSINESS, MICROBUSINESS, AND RURAL COMMUNITY IMPACT: The proposal has no direct adverse economic impact for small businesses, microbusinesses, or rural communities; therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis specified in Texas Government Code, §2006.002, is required.
COST INCREASE TO REGULATED PERSONS: The proposal does not impose a cost on regulated persons, another state agency, a special district, or a local government and, therefore, is not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0045.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT: The proposal does not impose a burden on private real property and, therefore, does not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, §2007.043.
GOVERNMENT GROWTH IMPACT: Texas Education Agency (TEA) staff prepared a Government Growth Impact Statement assessment for this proposed rulemaking. During the first five years the proposed rulemaking would be in effect, it would create a new regulation regarding the removal of a set of instructional materials from the lists of approved and rejected instructional materials outlined in TEC, §31.022.
The proposed rulemaking would not create or eliminate a government program; would not require the creation of new employee positions or elimination of existing employee positions; would not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency; would not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; would not expand, limit, or repeal an existing regulation; would not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to its applicability; and would not adversely affect the state's economy.
PUBLIC BENEFIT AND COST TO PERSONS: Mr. Davis has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposal is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposal would be to provide clarification to districts and publishers regarding the conditions under which the SBOE could remove instructional materials from the list of approved instructional materials and the use of the entitlements outlined in TEC, §48.307 or §48.308, related to materials removed from the approved instructional materials list. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposal.
DATA AND REPORTING IMPACT: The proposal would have no data or reporting impact.
PRINCIPAL AND CLASSROOM TEACHER PAPERWORK REQUIREMENTS: TEA has determined that the proposal would not require a written report or other paperwork to be completed by a principal or classroom teacher.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: The public comment period on the proposal begins August 2, 2024, and ends at 5:00 p.m. on September 3, 2024. The SBOE will take registered oral and written comments on the proposal at the appropriate committee meeting in September 2024 in accordance with the SBOE board operating policies and procedures. A request for a public hearing on the proposal submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 14 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register on August 2, 2024.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The new section is proposed under Texas Education Code (TEC), §31.003(a), which permits the State Board of Education (SBOE) to adopt rules for the adoption, requisition, distribution, care, use, and disposal of instructional materials; and TEC, §31.022, as amended by House Bill 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, which requires the SBOE to review instructional materials that have been provided to the board by the Texas Education Agency under TEC, §31.023.
CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE. The new section implements Texas Education Code, §31.003(a) and §31.022, as amended by House Bill 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023
§67.43.Lists of Approved and Rejected Instructional Materials.
(a) The list of approved instructional materials shall be maintained by the State Board of Education (SBOE).
(b) The SBOE may remove instructional materials from the list of approved instructional materials if:
(1) the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS), Texas Prekindergarten Guidelines (TPG), or applicable English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS) intended to be covered by the material are revised or a publisher revises the material without the approval of the SBOE in accordance with Texas Education Code (TEC), §31.022(c);
(2) the instructional materials, through a finding of the SBOE, are not compliant with the parent portal standards in §67.83 of this title (relating to Publisher Parent Portal); or
(3) the instructional materials violate any provisions of TEC, Chapter 31.
(c) A publisher of the specific instructional material shall be provided a minimum of 30 days' notice of the proposed removal. A representative of the publisher of the specific instructional material shall be given the opportunity to address the SBOE at the meeting where the SBOE is considering removing that publisher's product from the list of approved materials.
(d) If instructional materials are removed from the list of approved instructional materials, school districts and open-enrollment charter schools may not apply the entitlements outlined in TEC, §48.307 or §48.308, to future purchases or subscriptions of the removed instructional materials.
(e) A school district or an open-enrollment charter school that selects subscription-based instructional materials from the list of approved instructional materials approved under TEC, §31.022 and §31.023, may cancel the subscription and subscribe to a new instructional material on the list of approved instructional materials before the end of the state contract period under TEC, §31.026, if:
(1) the district or charter school has used the instructional material for at least one school year and the Texas Education Agency (TEA) approves the change based on a written request to TEA by the district or charter school that specifies the reasons for changing the instructional material used by the district or charter school; or
(2) the instructional material to which the district or charter school is subscribed is removed from the list of approved instructional materials by the SBOE.
(f) The list of rejected instructional materials shall be maintained by the SBOE.
(g) Instructional materials shall be removed from the list of rejected instructional materials if a publisher submits a revised set of instructional materials for review through the process required by TEC, §31.022 and §31.023, and the SBOE places the revised instructional materials on the list of approved instructional materials.
(h) The SBOE may remove instructional materials from the list of rejected instructional materials if a publisher submits a revised set of instructional materials for review through the process required by TEC, §31.023 and §31.022, and the SBOE takes no action before the end of the calendar year.
(i) This section applies to instructional materials approved by the SBOE after January 1, 2024.
The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 22, 2024.
TRD-202403223
Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez
Director, Rulemaking
Texas Education Agency
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 1, 2024
For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497
SUBCHAPTER C. OTHER PROVISIONS
The State Board of Education (SBOE) proposes an amendment to §74.27, concerning innovative courses and programs. The proposed amendment would correct the criteria for innovative courses to be considered for sunset to align with the language approved by the SBOE in November 2023.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION: After the SBOE adopted new rules concerning graduation requirements, the previously approved experimental courses were phased out as of August 31, 1998. Following the adoption of the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS), school districts now submit requests for innovative course approval for courses that do not have TEKS. The process outlined in §74.27 provides authority for the SBOE to approve innovative courses. Each year, Texas Education Agency (TEA) provides the opportunity for school districts and other entities to submit applications for proposed innovative courses. TEA staff works with applicants to fine tune their applications, which are then submitted to the Committee on Instruction for consideration.
At the June 2023 meeting, the Committee on Instruction discussed an amendment to §74.27 to add a provision for the sunset of innovative courses that meet certain criteria. The board approved for first reading and filing authorization the proposed amendment to §74.27 at its August-September 2023 meeting. At the November 2023 SBOE meeting, the board approved for second reading and final adoption the proposed amendment to §74.27, which included as a criteria for consideration for sunset a provision that a course must have been approved for at least three years and meet at least one additional criteria. When TEA staff filed the rule as adopted with the Texas Register, the filing did not include the provision that a course must have been approved for at least three years and meet at least one additional criteria to be considered for sunset. The amendment became effective February 18, 2024.
In order to correct the error made by TEA, the proposed amendment would correct the criteria for innovative courses to be considered for sunset to align with the language approved by the SBOE in November 2023.
The SBOE approved the proposed amendment for first reading and filing authorization at its June 28, 2024 meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT: Monica Martinez, associate commissioner for standards and programs, has determined that there are no additional costs to state or local government, including school districts and open-enrollment charter schools, required to comply with the proposal.
LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT: The proposal has no effect on local economy; therefore, no local employment impact statement is required under Texas Government Code, §2001.022.
SMALL BUSINESS, MICROBUSINESS, AND RURAL COMMUNITY IMPACT: The proposal has no direct adverse economic impact for small businesses, microbusinesses, or rural communities; therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis specified in Texas Government Code, §2006.002, is required.
COST INCREASE TO REGULATED PERSONS: The proposal does not impose a cost on regulated persons, another state agency, a special district, or a local government and, therefore, is not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0045.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT: The proposal does not impose a burden on private real property and, therefore, does not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, §2007.043.
GOVERNMENT GROWTH IMPACT: TEA staff prepared a Government Growth Impact Statement assessment for this proposed rulemaking. During the first five years the proposed rulemaking would be in effect, it would limit an existing regulation by limiting the scope of innovative courses considered by criteria listed in §74.27(a)(9) to those that have been approved for at least three years.
The proposed rulemaking would not create or eliminate a government program; would not require the creation of new employee positions or elimination of existing employee positions; would not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency; would not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; would not create a new regulation; would not expand or repeal an existing regulation; would not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to its applicability; and would not positively or adversely affect the state's economy.
PUBLIC BENEFIT AND COST TO PERSONS: Ms. Martinez has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposal is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposal would be to correct the criteria for innovative courses to be considered for sunset to align with the language approved by the SBOE to avoid confusion. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposal.
DATA AND REPORTING IMPACT: The proposal would have no data or reporting impact.
PRINCIPAL AND CLASSROOM TEACHER PAPERWORK REQUIREMENTS: TEA has determined that the proposal would not require a written report or other paperwork to be completed by a principal or classroom teacher.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: The public comment period on the proposal begins August 2, 2024, and ends at 5:00 p.m. on September 3, 2024. The SBOE will take registered oral and written comments on the proposal at the appropriate committee meeting in September 2024 in accordance with the SBOE board operating policies and procedures. A request for a public hearing on the proposal submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 14 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register on August 2, 2024.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The amendment is proposed under Texas Education Code, §28.002(f), which authorizes local school districts to offer courses in addition to those in the required curriculum for local credit and requires the State Board of Education to be flexible in approving a course for credit for high school graduation.
CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE. The amendment implements Texas Education Code, §28.002(f).
§74.27.Innovative Courses and Programs.
(a) A school district may offer innovative courses to enable students to master knowledge, skills, and competencies not included in the essential knowledge and skills of the required curriculum.
(1) The State Board of Education (SBOE) may approve discipline-based courses in the foundation or enrichment curriculum and courses that do not fall within any of the subject areas listed in the foundation and enrichment curricula when the applying school district or organization demonstrates that the proposed course is academically rigorous and addresses documented student needs.
(2) Applications shall not be approved if the proposed course significantly duplicates the content of a Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS)-based course or can reasonably be taught within an existing TEKS-based course.
(3) To request approval from the SBOE, the applying school district or organization must submit a request for approval at least six months before planned implementation that includes:
(A) a description of the course and its essential knowledge and skills;
(B) the rationale and justification for the request in terms of student need;
(C) data that demonstrates successful piloting of the course in Texas;
(D) a description of activities, major resources, and materials to be used;
(E) the methods of evaluating student outcomes;
(F) the qualifications of the teacher;
(G) any training required in order to teach the course and any associated costs;
(H) the amount of credit requested; and
(I) a copy of or electronic access to any recommended instructional resources for the course.
(4) To request approval for a career and technical education innovative course, the applying school district or organization must submit with its request for approval evidence that the course is aligned with state and/or regional labor market data.
(5) To request approval of a new innovative course, the applying school district or organization must submit with its request for approval evidence that the course has been successfully piloted in its entirety in at least one school in the state of Texas.
(6) The requirements of paragraphs (3)(C) and (5) of this subsection do not apply to the consideration of a course developed to support a program of study in career and technical education.
(7) Newly approved innovative courses shall be approved for a period of three years, and courses approved for renewal shall be approved for a period of five years.
(8) With the approval of the local board of trustees, a school district may offer, without changes or deletions to content, any state-approved innovative course.
(9) Texas Education Agency shall review all approved innovative courses once every two years and provide for consideration for sunset a list of innovative courses that have been approved as an innovative course for at least three years and meet one of the following criteria:
(A) zero enrollment for the previous two years;
(B) average enrollment of less than 100 students statewide for the previous three years;
(C) student enrollment at an average of fewer than 20 districts or charter schools statewide for the previous three years;
(D) duplicative of another innovative or TEKS-based course; or
(E) approved for implementation as a TEKS-based course.
(b) An ethnic studies course that has been approved by the SBOE as an innovative course shall be considered by the SBOE at a subsequent meeting for inclusion in the TEKS.
(1) Only comprehensive ethnic studies courses in Native American studies, Latino studies, African American studies, and/or Asian Pacific Islander studies, inclusive of history, government, economics, civic engagement, culture, and science and technology, shall be considered by the SBOE.
(2) The chair of the Committee on Instruction, in accordance with SBOE Operating Rule 2.5(b), shall collaborate with the board chair to place the item on the next available Committee on Instruction agenda following SBOE approval of the innovative course.
The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 22, 2024.
TRD-202403212
Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez
Director, Rulemaking
Texas Education Agency
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 1, 2024
For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497
SUBCHAPTER B. ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY STANDARDS
(Editor's note: In accordance with Texas Government Code, §2002.014, which permits the omission of material which is "cumbersome, expensive, or otherwise inexpedient," the figures in 19 TAC §120.20 and 19 TAC §120.21 are not included in the print version of the Texas Register. The figures are available in the on-line version of the August 2, 2024, issue of the Texas Register.)
The State Board of Education (SBOE) proposes new §120.20 and §120.21, concerning English language proficiency standards (ELPS). The proposed new sections would relocate the ELPS from 19 TAC §74.4 and include updates to ensure the standards remain current and comply with federal requirements.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION: In 1998, standards for English as a second language (ESL) for students in Kindergarten-Grade 12 were adopted as part of 19 TAC Chapter 128, Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills for Spanish Language Arts and Reading and English as a Second Language. In a subsequent Title III monitoring visit, the U.S. Department of Education (USDE) indicated that there was insufficient evidence demonstrating that the ESL standards outlined in 19 TAC Chapter 128 were aligned to state academic content and achievement standards in mathematics, as required by the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), §2113(b)(2). In November 2007, the SBOE adopted the ELPS as part of 19 TAC Chapter 74, Curriculum Requirements, to comply with NCLB requirements. The adopted ELPS in 19 TAC §74.4 clarified that state standards in English language acquisition must be implemented as an integral part of the instruction in each foundation and enrichment subject. Additionally, English language proficiency levels of beginning, intermediate, advanced, and advanced high in the domains of listening, speaking, reading, and writing were established as part of the ELPS, as required by NCLB. The superseded second language acquisition standards in 19 TAC Chapter 128 were also repealed in September 2008 during the process of revising the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) in 19 TAC Chapters 110 and 128.
The SBOE began review and revision of the ELPS in 2019, in accordance with the SBOE's approved TEKS and instructional materials review schedule. Applications to serve on ELPS review work groups were posted on the Texas Education Agency (TEA) website in December 2018, and TEA distributed a survey to collect information from educators regarding the current ELPS. Work groups were convened in March, May, August, September, and October 2019. In September 2019, the USDE indicated that Texas only partially met the requirements of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act, and requested additional evidence that the ELPS are aligned to the state's academic content standards and contain language proficiency expectations needed for emergent bilingual students to demonstrate achievement of the state academic standards appropriate to each grade level/grade band in at least reading language arts, mathematics, and science.
In response to feedback from work group members and the USDE, TEA staff convened a panel of experts in second language acquisition from Texas institutions of higher education to complete an analysis of the work group recommendations and current research on English language acquisition. Based on the panel's findings and direction from the SBOE, TEA executed personal services contracts with the panel members and a representative of an education service center to prepare a draft of revisions to the ELPS. Text of the draft ELPS completed by the writers' panel was presented to the SBOE at the June 2023 SBOE meeting.
Applications to serve on the 2023-2024 ELPS review work groups were collected by TEA from June 2023 through January 2024. TEA staff provided SBOE members with applications for approval to serve on ELPS work groups in July, September, and December 2023 and January 2024. ELPS review work groups were convened in August, September, and November 2023 and in March 2024 with the charge of reviewing and revising the expert panel's draft. In April 2024, the SBOE held a discussion on the proposed new ELPS, and in May and June 2024 TEA convened a final work group to complete the recommendations for the new ELPS.
The new sections would propose new ELPS for implementation in the 2026-2027 school year. To make the ELPS easier for the public to locate and to improve organization of the standards, it is recommended that the standards be moved from 19 TAC §74.4 to 19 TAC Chapter 120, Subchapter B.
The SBOE approved the proposed new sections for first reading and filing authorization at its June 28, 2024 meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT: Monica Martinez, associate commissioner for standards and programs, has determined that for the first five years the proposal is in effect (2024-2028), there will be fiscal implications to state government. For fiscal year 2024, the estimated cost to TEA to reimburse committee members for travel to review and revise the ELPS is $50,000. There will be implications for TEA if the state develops professional development to help teachers and administrators understand the revised ELPS.
There may be fiscal implications for school districts and charter schools to implement the proposed new ELPS, which may include the need for professional development and revisions to district-developed databases, curriculum, and scope and sequence documents. Since curriculum and instruction decisions are made at the local district level, it is difficult to estimate the fiscal impact on any given district.
LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT: The proposal has no effect on local economy; therefore, no local employment impact statement is required under Texas Government Code, §2001.022.
SMALL BUSINESS, MICROBUSINESS, AND RURAL COMMUNITY IMPACT: The proposal has no direct adverse economic impact for small businesses, microbusinesses, or rural communities; therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis specified in Texas Government Code, §2006.002, is required.
COST INCREASE TO REGULATED PERSONS: The proposal does not impose a cost on regulated persons, another state agency, a special district, or a local government and, therefore, is not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0045.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT: The proposal does not impose a burden on private real property and, therefore, does not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, §2007.043.
GOVERNMENT GROWTH IMPACT: TEA staff prepared a Government Growth Impact Statement assessment for this proposed rulemaking. During the first five years the proposed rulemaking would be in effect, it would create new regulations by requiring new, more specific, ELPS to be taught by school districts and charter schools.
The proposed rulemaking would not create or eliminate a government program; would not require the creation of new employee positions or elimination of existing employee positions; would not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency; would not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; would not expand, limit, or repeal an existing regulation; would not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to its applicability; and would not positively or adversely affect the state's economy.
PUBLIC BENEFIT AND COST TO PERSONS: Ms. Martinez has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposal is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposal would be to better align the ELPS for second language acquisition to ensure the standards are current and comply with federal requirements. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposal.
DATA AND REPORTING IMPACT: The proposal would have no data or reporting impact.
PRINCIPAL AND CLASSROOM TEACHER PAPERWORK REQUIREMENTS: TEA has determined that the proposal would not require a written report or other paperwork to be completed by a principal or classroom teacher.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: The public comment period on the proposal begins August 2, 2024, and ends at 5:00 p.m. on September 3, 2024. The SBOE will take registered oral and written comments on the proposal at the appropriate committee meeting in September 2024 in accordance with the SBOE board operating policies and procedures. A request for a public hearing on the proposal submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 14 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register on August 2, 2024.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The new sections are proposed under Texas Education Code (TEC), §7.102(c)(4), which requires the State Board of Education to establish curriculum and graduation requirements; TEC, §28.002(a), which identifies the subjects of the required curriculum; and TEC, §29.051, which establishes bilingual education and special language programs in public schools and provides supplemental financial assistance to help school districts meet the extra costs of the programs.
CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE. The new sections implement Texas Education Code, §§7.102(c)(4), 28.002(a), and 29.051.
§120.20.English Language Proficiency Standards, Kindergarten-Grade 3, Adopted 2024.
(a) Implementation. The provisions of this section shall be implemented by school districts beginning with the 2026-2027 school year.
(b) General requirements. In fulfilling the requirements of this section, school districts and charter schools shall:
(1) identify the student's English language proficiency levels in the domains of listening, speaking, reading, and writing in accordance with the proficiency level descriptors for the pre-production, beginning, intermediate, high intermediate, and advanced levels delineated in subsection (e) of this section;
(2) provide instruction in the knowledge and skills of the foundation and enrichment curriculum in a manner that is linguistically accommodated (communicated, sequenced, and scaffolded) commensurate with the student's levels of English language proficiency to ensure that the student learns the knowledge and skills in the required curriculum;
(3) provide content-based instruction including the cross-curricular second language acquisition essential knowledge and skills in subsection (d) of this section in a manner that is linguistically accommodated to help the student acquire English language proficiency; and
(4) provide intensive and ongoing foundational second language acquisition instruction to emergent bilingual (EB) students in Kindergarten-Grade 12 who are at the pre-production, beginning, or intermediate level of English language proficiency in listening, speaking, reading, or writing as determined by the state's English language proficiency assessment system. These EB students require focused, targeted, and systematic second language acquisition instruction to provide them with the foundation of English language necessary to support content-based instruction and accelerated learning of English.
(c) Introduction.
(1) The English language proficiency standards (ELPS) outline student expectations and proficiency level descriptors for EB students in English. The ELPS are organized across four language domains: listening, speaking, reading, and writing.
(2) Language acquisition is a complex process that consists of several interrelated components, including phonetics, phonology, semantics, syntax, morphology, and pragmatics. As students develop proficiency in these language structures, they are able to make connections between their primary language and English.
(3) Classroom contexts foster social and academic registers, which are types of language appropriate for a situation or setting, to support language proficiency. Informal (social) language consists of English needed for students to effectively interact, exchange ideas, and engage in various settings and contexts. Formal (academic) language consists of oral and written language used to build knowledge, participate in content-specific discourse, and process complex academic material found in formal school settings and interactions.
(4) The progression of skills in the four language domains are developed simultaneously and can be divided into two categories: receptive skills and expressive skills. Listening and reading are the receptive (input) skills. Students' development in receptive skills is necessary for comprehension and attainment of the English language and content. Speaking and writing are the expressive (output) skills. Students' ability to express and share their personal ideas and content knowledge allow teachers the opportunity to check for understanding and adjust instruction. Effective content-based language instruction involves engaging EB students in scaffolded opportunities to listen, speak, read, and write at their current levels of proficiency while gradually increasing linguistic complexity.
(5) In order for EB students to be successful, educators must create an environment that welcomes and encourages students to leverage their unique cultural and linguistic experiences as they develop English language skills and learn academic content. Educators must cultivate an approach that integrates students' and their families' funds of knowledge into the classroom instructional practices. Culturally and linguistically sustaining practices leverage and celebrate students' cultural heritage and backgrounds while elevating their cultural and linguistic identities. Teaching and learning cognates that connect both (or multiple) languages can also construct bridges between languages and increase confidence as English language acquisition progresses.
(6) The ELPS student expectations are the knowledge and skills students must demonstrate. They indicate what students should know and be able to do in order to meet academic content standards. Proficiency level descriptors describe behaviors EB students exhibit across five proficiency levels as they acquire English. EB students may exhibit different proficiency levels within and across the domains of listening, speaking, reading, and writing.
(7) The ELPS demonstrate an asset-based approach to address the affective, linguistic, and cognitive needs of EB students in accordance with §89.1210(b) of this title (relating to Program Content and Design) as follows:
(A) acknowledge and leverage the existing funds of knowledge students possess, including linguistic repertoire, cultural heritage, and background knowledge;
(B) demonstrate targeted and intentional academic language skills to ensure content-area teachers are able to accurately evaluate the abilities of EB students and scaffold toward increasingly complex English students hear, speak, and are expected to read and write; and
(C) provide an exact and incremental measure of the stages of English language acquisition with attention to the fact that EB students at all levels of proficiency can engage in cognitively demanding tasks and master the required essential knowledge and skills with appropriate language support.
(8) The proficiency level descriptors are organized into general proficiency level descriptors and content-area proficiency level descriptors. General proficiency level descriptors are descriptions of a broad scope of student behaviors that can be observed in a variety of educational settings and across content areas. Content-area proficiency level descriptors describe student behaviors and language associated with discipline-specific learning in English language arts and reading, mathematics, science, and social studies.
(d) Cross-curricular English language acquisition student expectations.
(1) Student expectations--listening. The EB student listens to a variety of speakers, including teachers, peers, and multimedia, to gain an increasing level of comprehension in all content areas. The EB student may be at the pre-production, beginning, intermediate, high intermediate, or advanced proficiency levels in listening. The student is expected to:
(A) distinguish sounds and intonation patterns by responding orally, in writing, or with gestures;
(B) demonstrate an understanding of content-area vocabulary when heard during formal and informal classroom interactions by responding with gestures or images, orally, or in writing;
(C) follow oral directions with accuracy;
(D) use context to construct the meaning of descriptive language, words with multiple meanings, register, or figurative language such as idiomatic expressions heard during formal and informal classroom interactions;
(E) demonstrate listening comprehension from information presented orally during formal and informal classroom interactions by recalling, retelling, responding, or asking for clarification or additional details; and
(F) derive meaning from a variety of auditory multimedia sources to build and reinforce concepts and language acquisition.
(2) Student expectations--speaking. The EB student speaks using a variety of language structures for a variety of purposes with an awareness of different language registers (formal/informal) using vocabulary with increasing accuracy and fluency in all content areas. The EB student may be at the pre-production, beginning, intermediate, high intermediate, or advanced proficiency level of English language acquisition in speaking. The student is expected to:
(A) produce sounds of newly acquired vocabulary such as long and short vowels, silent letters, and consonant clusters to pronounce words with accuracy;
(B) speak using content-area vocabulary during formal and informal classroom interactions to demonstrate acquisition of new words and high-frequency words;
(C) speak using a variety of language and grammatical structures, sentence lengths and types, and connecting words;
(D) speak using appropriate register to convey a message during formal and informal classroom interactions with accuracy and fluency;
(E) narrate, describe, or explain information or persuade orally with increasing specificity and detail during formal and informal classroom interactions; and
(F) restate, ask questions about, or respond to information during formal and informal classroom interactions.
(3) Student expectations--reading. The EB student reads a variety of texts for different purposes with an increasing level of comprehension in all content areas. The EB student may be at the pre-production, beginning, intermediate, high intermediate, or advanced proficiency levels of English language acquisition in reading. For Kindergarten and Grade 1, certain student expectations apply to text read aloud for students not yet at the stage of decoding written text. The student is expected to:
(A) demonstrate awareness of print concepts and directionality of reading as left to right and top to bottom;
(B) decode words using relationships between sounds and letters;
(C) use high-frequency words, cognates, and content-area vocabulary to comprehend written classroom materials;
(D) use context to construct the meaning of figurative language such as idiomatic expressions, descriptive language, and words with multiple meanings to comprehend classroom materials;
(E) use pre-reading strategies, including previewing text features, connecting to prior knowledge, organizing ideas, and making predictions, to develop comprehension;
(F) derive meaning from and demonstrate comprehension of content-area texts using visual, contextual, and linguistic supports;
(G) demonstrate reading comprehension of content-area texts by making connections, retelling, or responding to questions; and
(H) read with fluency and demonstrate comprehension of content-area text.
(4) Student expectations--writing. The EB student writes using a variety of language structures with increasing accuracy to effectively address a variety of purposes (formal and informal) and audiences in all content areas. The EB student may be at the pre-production, beginning, intermediate, high intermediate, or advanced proficiency levels of English language acquisition in writing. For Kindergarten and Grade 1, certain student expectations do not apply until the student has reached the proficiency level of generating original written text using a standard writing system. The student is expected to:
(A) apply relationships between sounds and letters of the English language to represent sounds when writing;
(B) spell words following conventional spelling patterns and rules;
(C) write using high-frequency words and content-area vocabulary;
(D) write using a variety of grade-appropriate sentence lengths and types and connecting words;
(E) write formal or informal text using conventions such as capitalization and punctuation and grammatical structures such as subject-verb agreement and verb tense; and
(F) write to narrate, describe, explain, respond, or persuade with detail in the content areas.
(e) Proficiency level descriptors.
(1) The following five proficiency levels describe students' progress in English language acquisition.
(A) Pre-production. The pre-production level, also known as the silent period, is the early stage of English language acquisition when receptive language is developing. Students develop comprehension when highly scaffolded instruction and linguistic support are provided. Student responses are mostly non-verbal.
(B) Beginning. The beginning level is characterized by speech emergence (expressive language) using one word or two-to-three-word phrases. Students at this level require highly scaffolded instruction and linguistic support. Students at this level begin to consistently use present tense verbs and repeat keywords and familiar phrases when engaging in formal and informal interactions.
(C) Intermediate. The intermediate level is characterized by the ability to use receptive and expressive language with demonstrated literal comprehension. Students at this level need moderately scaffolded instruction and linguistic support. Additional visual and linguistic support is needed to understand unfamiliar or abstract concepts such as figurative language, humor, and cultural or societal references. Students at this level begin to consistently use short phrases and simple sentences or ask short questions to demonstrate comprehension during formal and informal interactions.
(D) High intermediate. Students at the high intermediate level begin to consistently use a variety of sentence types, express opinions, share thoughts, and ask for clarification. Students at this level have an increased level of literal and abstract comprehension. Students may need minimal scaffolded instruction and linguistic support to engage in formal and informal classroom interactions.
(E) Advanced. The advanced level is characterized by the ability of students to engage in formal and informal classroom interactions with little to no linguistic support. Students at this level engage in discourse using content-area vocabulary and a variety of grammatical structures with increasing accuracy.
(2) The Kindergarten-Grade 3 proficiency level descriptors are described in the figure provided in this paragraph.
Figure: 19 TAC §120.20(e)(2) (.pdf)
§120.21.English Language Proficiency Standards, Grades 4-12, Adopted 2024.
(a) Implementation. The provisions of this section shall be implemented by school districts beginning with the 2026-2027 school year.
(b) General requirements. In fulfilling the requirements of this section, school districts and charter schools shall:
(1) identify the student's English language proficiency levels in the domains of listening, speaking, reading, and writing in accordance with the proficiency level descriptors for the pre-production, beginning, intermediate, high intermediate, and advanced levels delineated in subsection (e) of this section;
(2) provide instruction in the knowledge and skills of the foundation and enrichment curriculum in a manner that is linguistically accommodated (communicated, sequenced, and scaffolded) commensurate with the student's levels of English language proficiency to ensure that the student learns the knowledge and skills in the required curriculum;
(3) provide content-based instruction including the cross-curricular second language acquisition essential knowledge and skills in subsection (d) of this section in a manner that is linguistically accommodated to help the student acquire English language proficiency; and
(4) provide intensive and ongoing foundational second language acquisition instruction to emergent bilingual (EB) students in Kindergarten-Grade 12 who are at the pre-production, beginning, or intermediate level of English language proficiency in listening, speaking, reading, or writing as determined by the state's English language proficiency assessment system. These EB students require focused, targeted, and systematic second language acquisition instruction to provide them with the foundation of English language necessary to support content-based instruction and accelerated learning of English.
(c) Introduction.
(1) The English language proficiency standards (ELPS) outline student expectations and proficiency level descriptors for EB students in English. The ELPS are organized across four language domains: listening, speaking, reading, and writing.
(2) Language acquisition is a complex process that consists of several interrelated components, including phonetics, phonology, semantics, syntax, morphology, and pragmatics. As students develop proficiency in these language structures, they are able to make connections between their primary language and English.
(3) Classroom contexts foster social and academic registers, which are types of language appropriate for a situation or setting, to support language proficiency. Informal (social) language consists of English needed for students to effectively interact, exchange ideas, and engage in various settings and contexts. Formal (academic) language consists of oral and written language used to build knowledge, participate in content-specific discourse, and process complex academic material found in formal school settings and interactions.
(4) The progression of skills in the four language domains are developed simultaneously and can be divided into two categories: receptive skills and expressive skills. Listening and reading are the receptive (input) skills. Students' development in receptive skills is necessary for comprehension and attainment of the English language and content. Speaking and writing are the expressive (output) skills. Students' ability to express and share their personal ideas and content knowledge allow teachers the opportunity to check for understanding and adjust instruction. Effective content-based language instruction involves engaging EB students in scaffolded opportunities to listen, speak, read, and write at their current levels of proficiency while gradually increasing linguistic complexity.
(5) In order for EB students to be successful, educators must create an environment that welcomes and encourages students to leverage their unique cultural and linguistic experiences as they develop English language skills and learn academic content. Educators must cultivate an approach that integrates students' and their families' funds of knowledge into the classroom instructional practices. Culturally and linguistically sustaining practices leverage and celebrate students' cultural heritage and backgrounds while elevating their cultural and linguistic identities. Teaching and learning cognates that connect both (or multiple) languages can also construct bridges between languages and increase confidence as English language acquisition progresses.
(6) The ELPS student expectations are the knowledge and skills students must demonstrate. They indicate what students should know and be able to do in order to meet academic content standards. Proficiency level descriptors describe behaviors EB students exhibit across five proficiency levels as they acquire English. EB students may exhibit different proficiency levels within and across the domains of listening, speaking, reading, and writing.
(7) The ELPS demonstrate an asset-based approach to address the affective, linguistic, and cognitive needs of EB students in accordance with §89.1210(b) of this title (relating to Program Content and Design) as follows:
(A) acknowledge and leverage the existing funds of knowledge students possess, including linguistic repertoire, cultural heritage, and background knowledge;
(B) demonstrate targeted and intentional academic language skills to ensure content-area teachers are able to accurately evaluate the abilities of EB students and scaffold toward increasingly complex English students hear, speak, and are expected to read and write; and
(C) provide an exact and incremental measure of the stages of English language acquisition with attention to the fact that EB students at all levels of proficiency can engage in cognitively demanding tasks and master the required essential knowledge and skills with appropriate language support.
(8) The proficiency level descriptors are organized into general proficiency level descriptors and content-area proficiency level descriptors. General proficiency level descriptors are descriptions of a broad scope of student behaviors that can be observed in a variety of educational settings and across content areas. Content-area proficiency level descriptors describe student behaviors and language associated with discipline-specific learning in English language arts and reading, mathematics, science, and social studies.
(d) Cross-curricular English language acquisition student expectations.
(1) Student expectations--listening. The EB student listens to a variety of speakers, including teachers, peers, and multimedia, to gain an increasing level of comprehension in all content areas. The EB student may be at the pre-production, beginning, intermediate, high intermediate, or advanced proficiency levels in listening. The student is expected to:
(A) distinguish sounds and intonation patterns by responding with gestures or images, orally, or in writing;
(B) use contextual factors or word analysis such as cognates, Greek and Latin prefixes, suffixes, and roots to comprehend content-specific vocabulary when heard during formal and informal classroom interactions by responding with gestures or images, orally, or in writing;
(C) respond with accuracy to oral directions, instructions, and requests;
(D) use context to construct the meaning of descriptive language, words with multiple meanings, register, and figurative language such as idiomatic expressions heard during formal and informal classroom interactions;
(E) demonstrate listening comprehension from information presented orally during formal and informal classroom interactions by restating, responding, paraphrasing, summarizing, or asking for clarification or additional details; and
(F) derive meaning from a variety of auditory multimedia sources to build and reinforce concepts and language acquisition.
(2) Student expectations--speaking. The EB student speaks using a variety of language structures for a variety of purposes with an awareness of different language registers (formal/informal) using vocabulary with increasing accuracy and fluency in all content areas. The EB student may be at the pre-production, beginning, intermediate, high intermediate, or advanced proficiency level of English language acquisition in speaking. The student is expected to:
(A) pronounce words, including high-frequency words, cognates, and increasingly complex syllable types, with accuracy;
(B) speak using content-area vocabulary during formal and informal classroom interactions to demonstrate acquisition of new words and high-frequency words;
(C) speak using a variety of language and grammatical structures, sentence lengths and types, and transition words;
(D) speak using appropriate register to convey a message during formal and informal classroom interactions with accuracy and fluency;
(E) narrate, describe, explain, justify, discuss, elaborate, or evaluate orally with increasing specificity and detail in academic context or discourse; and
(F) restate, ask questions about, or respond to information during formal and informal classroom interactions.
(3) Student expectations--reading. The EB student reads a variety of texts for different purposes with an increasing level of comprehension in all content areas. The EB student may be at the pre-production, beginning, intermediate, high intermediate, or advanced proficiency levels of English language acquisition in reading. The student is expected to:
(A) demonstrate awareness of print concepts and directionality of reading as left to right and top to bottom;
(B) decode words using the relationships between sounds and letters and identify syllable patterns, cognates, affixes, roots, or base words;
(C) use high-frequency words, contextual factors, and word analysis such as Greek and Latin prefixes, suffixes, and roots and cognates to comprehend content-area vocabulary in text;
(D) use context to construct the meaning of figurative language such as idiomatic expressions, descriptive language, and words with multiple meanings to comprehend a variety of text;
(E) use pre-reading strategies, including previewing the text features, connecting to prior knowledge, organizing ideas, and making predictions to develop comprehension;
(F) derive meaning from and demonstrate comprehension of content-area texts using visual, contextual, and linguistic supports;
(G) demonstrate reading comprehension of content-area texts by retelling, paraphrasing, summarizing, and responding to questions; and
(H) read with fluency and prosody and demonstrate comprehension of content-area text.
(4) Student expectations--writing. The EB student writes using a variety of language structures with increasing accuracy to effectively address a variety of purposes (formal and informal) and audiences in all content areas. The EB student may be at the pre-production, beginning, intermediate, high intermediate, or advanced proficiency levels of English language acquisition in writing. The student is expected to:
(A) apply relationships between sounds and letters of the English language to represent sounds when writing;
(B) write text following conventional spelling patterns and rules;
(C) write using a combination of high-frequency words and content-area vocabulary;
(D) write content-area texts using a variety of sentence lengths and types and transition words;
(E) write content-area specific text using conventions such as capitalization, punctuation, and abbreviations and grammatical structures such as subject-verb agreement, verb tense, possessive case, and contractions; and
(F) write to narrate, describe, explain, respond, or justify with supporting details and evidence using appropriate content, style, register, and conventions for specific purpose and audience.
(e) Proficiency level descriptors.
(1) The following five proficiency levels describe students' progress in English language acquisition.
(A) Pre-production. The pre-production level, also known as the silent period, is the early stage of English language acquisition when receptive language is developing. Students develop comprehension when highly scaffolded instruction and linguistic support are provided. Student responses are mostly non-verbal.
(B) Beginning. The beginning level is characterized by speech emergence (expressive language) using one word or two-to-three-word phrases. Students at this level require highly scaffolded instruction and linguistic support. Students at this level begin to consistently use present tense verbs and repeat keywords and familiar phrases when engaging in formal and informal interactions.
(C) Intermediate. The intermediate level is characterized by the ability to use receptive and expressive language with demonstrated literal comprehension. Students at this level need moderately scaffolded instruction and linguistic support. Additional visual and linguistic support is needed to understand unfamiliar or abstract concepts such as figurative language, humor, and cultural or societal references. Students at this level begin to consistently use short phrases and simple sentences or ask short questions to demonstrate comprehension during formal and informal interactions.
(D) High intermediate. Students at the high intermediate level begin to consistently use a variety of sentence types, express opinions, share thoughts, and ask for clarification. Students at this level have an increased level of literal and abstract comprehension. Students may need minimal scaffolded instruction and linguistic support to engage in formal and informal classroom interactions.
(E) Advanced. The advanced level is characterized by the ability of students to engage in formal and informal classroom interactions with little to no linguistic support. Students at this level engage in discourse using content-area vocabulary and a variety of grammatical structures with increasing accuracy.
(2) The Grades 4-12 proficiency level descriptors are described in the figure provided in this paragraph.
Figure: 19 TAC §120.21(e)(2) (.pdf)
The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 22, 2024.
TRD-202403214
Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez
Director, Rulemaking
Texas Education Agency
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 1, 2024
For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497
SUBCHAPTER J. HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM
The State Board of Education (SBOE) proposes an amendment to §127.482, concerning Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills for career development and career and technical education. The proposed amendment would make technical adjustments to prerequisites to align with the recently revised career and technical education (CTE) programs of study.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION: The federal Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act, commonly referred to as Perkins V, requires states that receive federal CTE funds to align CTE programs of study to high-wage, in-demand, and high-skill occupations. In fall 2023, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) engaged members of the workforce, secondary education, and higher education to advise on the development and refresh of programs of study, which include coherent course sequences, industry-based certifications, and work-based learning opportunities to ensure students are prepared for high-wage, in-demand, and high-skill careers in Texas.
The proposed amendment would align language related to prerequisites to ensure alignment with the refreshed programs of study.
The SBOE approved the proposed amendment for first reading and filing authorization at its June 28, 2024 meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT: Monica Martinez, associate commissioner for standards and programs, has determined that there are no additional costs to state or local government, including school districts and open-enrollment charter schools, required to comply with the proposal.
LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT: The proposal has no effect on local economy; therefore, no local employment impact statement is required under Texas Government Code, §2001.022.
SMALL BUSINESS, MICROBUSINESS, AND RURAL COMMUNITY IMPACT: The proposal has no direct adverse economic impact for small businesses, microbusinesses, or rural communities; therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis specified in Texas Government Code, §2006.002, is required.
COST INCREASE TO REGULATED PERSONS: The proposal does not impose a cost on regulated persons, another state agency, a special district, or a local government and, therefore, is not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0045.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT: The proposal does not impose a burden on private real property and, therefore, does not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, §2007.043.
GOVERNMENT GROWTH IMPACT: TEA staff prepared a Government Growth Impact Statement assessment for this proposed rulemaking. During the first five years the proposed rulemaking would be in effect, it would expand and limit existing regulations by adjusting the options for prerequisites and corequisites for some courses.
The proposed rulemaking would not create or eliminate a government program; would not require the creation of new employee positions or elimination of existing employee positions; would not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency; would not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; would not create a new regulation; would not repeal an existing regulation; would not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to its applicability; and would not positively or adversely affect the state's economy.
PUBLIC BENEFIT AND COST TO PERSONS: Ms. Martinez has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposal is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposal would be to better align language related to prerequisites with the refreshed CTE programs of study and eliminate confusion. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposal.
DATA AND REPORTING IMPACT: The proposal would have no data or reporting impact.
PRINCIPAL AND CLASSROOM TEACHER PAPERWORK REQUIREMENTS: TEA has determined that the proposal would not require a written report or other paperwork to be completed by a principal or classroom teacher.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: The public comment period on the proposal begins August 2, 2024, and ends at 5:00 p.m. on September 3, 2024. The SBOE will take registered oral and written comments on the proposal at the appropriate committee meeting in September 2024 in accordance with the SBOE board operating policies and procedures. A request for a public hearing on the proposal submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 14 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register on August 2,2024.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The amendment is proposed under Texas Education Code (TEC), §7.102(c)(4), which requires the State Board of Education (SBOE) to establish curriculum and graduation requirements; TEC, §28.002(a), which identifies the subjects of the required curriculum; and TEC, §28.002(c), requires the SBOE to identify by rule the essential knowledge and skills of each subject in the required curriculum that all students should be able to demonstrate and that will be used in evaluating instructional materials and addressed on the state assessment instruments.
CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE. The amendment implements Texas Education Code, §7.102(c)(4) and §28.002(a) and (c).
§127.482.Food Science (One Credit), Adopted 2021.
(a) (No change.)
(b) General requirements. This course is recommended
for students in Grades 11 and 12. Prerequisites: one credit in biology,
one credit in chemistry, and at least one credit in a Level 2 or higher
course from the hospitality and tourism or agriculture, food,
and natural resources career clusters [cluster].
Recommended prerequisite: Principles of Hospitality and Tourism. This
course satisfies a high school science graduation requirement. Students
shall be awarded one credit for successful completion of this course.
(c) - (d) (No change.)
The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 22, 2024.
TRD-202403217
Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez
Director, Rulemaking
Texas Education Agency
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 1, 2024
For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497
The State Board of Education (SBOE) proposes amendments to §§130.30, 130.136, 130.137, 130.138, 130.143, 130.144, 130.445, and 130.446, concerning Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills for career and technical education. The proposed amendments would make technical adjustments to course titles, prerequisites, and corequisites to align with the recently revised career and technical education (CTE) programs of study.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION: The federal Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act, commonly referred to as Perkins V, requires states that receive federal CTE funds to align CTE programs of study to high-wage, in-demand, and high-skill occupations. In fall 2023, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) engaged members of the workforce, secondary education, and higher education to advise on the development and refresh of programs of study, which include coherent course sequences, industry-based certifications, and work-based learning opportunities, to ensure students are prepared for high-wage, in-demand, and high-skill careers in Texas.
The proposed amendments would align existing CTE course titles and language related to prerequisites and corequisites to ensure alignment with the refreshed programs of study.
The SBOE approved the proposed amendments for first reading and filing authorization at its June 28, 2024 meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT: Monica Martinez, associate commissioner for standards and programs, has determined that there are no additional costs to state or local government, including school districts and open-enrollment charter schools, required to comply with the proposal.
LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT: The proposal has no effect on local economy; therefore, no local employment impact statement is required under Texas Government Code, §2001.022.
SMALL BUSINESS, MICROBUSINESS, AND RURAL COMMUNITY IMPACT: The proposal has no direct adverse economic impact for small businesses, microbusinesses, or rural communities; therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis specified in Texas Government Code, §2006.002, is required.
COST INCREASE TO REGULATED PERSONS: The proposal does not impose a cost on regulated persons, another state agency, a special district, or a local government and, therefore, is not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0045.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT: The proposal does not impose a burden on private real property and, therefore, does not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, §2007.043.
GOVERNMENT GROWTH IMPACT: TEA staff prepared a Government Growth Impact Statement assessment for this proposed rulemaking. During the first five years the proposed rulemaking would be in effect, it would expand and limit existing regulations by adjusting the options for prerequisites and corequisites for some courses.
The proposed rulemaking would not create or eliminate a government program; would not require the creation of new employee positions or elimination of existing employee positions; would not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency; would not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; would not create a new regulation; would not repeal an existing regulation; would not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to its applicability; and would not positively or adversely affect the state's economy.
PUBLIC BENEFIT AND COST TO PERSONS: Ms. Martinez has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposal is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposal would be to better align existing course titles and language related to prerequisites and corequisites with the refreshed CTE programs of study. It would also ensure students have access to appropriate corequisite courses, update titles to be accurate and consistent with courses in other programs of study, and eliminate confusion. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposal.
DATA AND REPORTING IMPACT: The proposal would have no data or reporting impact.
PRINCIPAL AND CLASSROOM TEACHER PAPERWORK REQUIREMENTS: TEA has determined that the proposal would not require a written report or other paperwork to be completed by a principal or classroom teacher.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: The public comment period on the proposal begins August 2, 2024, and ends at 5:00 p.m. on September 3, 2024. The SBOE will take registered oral and written comments on the proposal at the appropriate committee meeting in September 2024 in accordance with the SBOE board operating policies and procedures. A request for a public hearing on the proposal submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 14 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register on August 2, 2024.
SUBCHAPTER A. AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The amendment is proposed under Texas Education Code (TEC), §7.102(c)(4), which requires the State Board of Education (SBOE) to establish curriculum and graduation requirements; TEC, §28.002(a), which identifies the subjects of the required curriculum; and TEC, §28.002(c), requires the SBOE to identify by rule the essential knowledge and skills of each subject in the required curriculum that all students should be able to demonstrate and that will be used in evaluating instructional materials and addressed on the state assessment instruments.
CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE. The amendment implements Texas Education Code, §7.102(c)(4) and §28.002(a) and (c).
§130.30.Agricultural Laboratory and Field Experience (One Credit), Adopted 2015.
(a) General requirements. This course is recommended
for students in Grades 11 and 12 as a corequisite course for students
participating in a coherent sequence of career and technical education
courses in the Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources or Energy
career clusters [Career Cluster]. This course provides
an enhancement opportunity for students to develop the additional
skills necessary to pursue industry certification.
(1) Recommended prerequisite: a minimum
of one credit from a course [the courses] in
the Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources or Energy career
clusters [Career Cluster].
(2) Corequisite: this [any
course in the Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources Career Cluster,
excluding Principles of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources.
This] course must be taken concurrently with a corequisite course
from the Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources or Energy career
clusters [Career Cluster] and may not be taken as
a stand-alone course. The following courses are permitted as corequisites:
(A) Agribusiness Management and Marketing;
(B) Livestock Production;
(C) Veterinary Medical Applications;
(D) Food Technology and Safety;
(E) Food Processing;
(F) Wildlife, Fisheries, and Ecology Management;
(G) Forestry and Woodland Ecosystems;
(H) Range Ecology and Management;
(I) Floral Design;
(J) Horticultural Science;
(K) Greenhouse Operation and Production;
(L) Agricultural Mechanics and Metal Technologies;
(M) Agricultural Structures Design and Fabrication;
(N) Agricultural Equipment Design and Fabrication;
(O) Agricultural Power Systems;
(P) Oil and Gas Production I;
(Q) Oil and Gas Production II;
(R) Energy and Natural Resource Technology; and
(S) Advanced Energy and Natural Resource Technology.
(3) Districts are encouraged to offer this lab in a consecutive block with the corequisite course to allow students sufficient time to master the content of both courses. Students shall be awarded one credit for successful completion of this course.
(b) - (c) (No change.)
The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 22, 2024.
TRD-202403218
Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez
Director, Rulemaking
Texas Education Agency
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 1, 2024
For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497
19 TAC §§130.136 - 130.138, 130.143, 130.144
STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The amendments are proposed under Texas Education Code (TEC), §7.102(c)(4), which requires the State Board of Education (SBOE) to establish curriculum and graduation requirements; TEC, §28.002(a), which identifies the subjects of the required curriculum; and TEC, §28.002(c), requires the SBOE to identify by rule the essential knowledge and skills of each subject in the required curriculum that all students should be able to demonstrate and that will be used in evaluating instructional materials and addressed on the state assessment instruments.
CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE. The amendments implement Texas Education Code, §7.102(c)(4) and §28.002(a) and (c).
§130.136.Foundations of Business
Communication and Technologies [Business Information Management
I] (One Credit), Adopted 2015.
(a) (No change.)
(b) Introduction.
(1) - (2) (No change.)
(3) In Foundations of Business Communication and
Technologies [Business Information Management I],
students implement personal and interpersonal skills to strengthen
individual performance in the workplace and in society and make a
successful transition to the workforce and postsecondary education.
Students apply technical skills to address business applications of
emerging technologies, create word-processing documents, develop a
spreadsheet, formulate a database, and make an electronic presentation
using appropriate software.
(4) - (5) (No change.)
(c) (No change.)
§130.137.Business Communication and Technologies [Business Information Management II]
(One Credit), Adopted 2015.
(a) General requirements. This course is recommended
for students in Grades 10-12. Prerequisite: Foundations of Business
Communication and Technologies [Business Information Management
I]. Recommended Prerequisite: Touch System Data Entry. Recommended
corequisite: Business Lab. Students shall be awarded one credit for
successful completion of this course.
(b) Introduction.
(1) - (2) (No change.)
(3) In Business Communication and Technologies [Business Information Management II], students implement personal
and interpersonal skills to strengthen individual performance in the
workplace and in society and make a successful transition to the workforce
or postsecondary education. Students apply technical skills to address
business applications of emerging technologies, create complex word-processing
documents, develop sophisticated spreadsheets using charts and graphs,
and make an electronic presentation using appropriate multimedia software.
(4) - (5) (No change.)
(c) (No change.)
§130.138.Business Lab (One Credit), Adopted 2015.
(a) General requirements. This course is recommended
for students in Grades 9-12 as a corequisite course for students participating
in a coherent sequence of career and technical education courses in
the Business Management and Administration Career Cluster. This course
provides an enhancement opportunity for students to develop the additional
skills necessary to pursue industry certification. Corequisite: any
course in the Business Management and Administration Career Cluster.
Recommended corequisite: Foundations of Business Communication
and Technologies or Business Communication and Technologies [Business
Information Management I or Business Information Management II].
This course must be taken concurrently with a corequisite course from
the Business Management and Administration Career Cluster and may
not be taken as a stand-alone course. Districts are encouraged to
offer this lab in a consecutive block with the corequisite course
to allow students sufficient time to master the content of both courses.
Students shall be awarded one credit for successful completion of
this course.
(b) Introduction.
(1) - (2) (No change.)
(3) Business Lab is designed to provide students an
opportunity to further enhance skills of previously studied knowledge
and skills and may be used as an extension of Foundations of
Business Communication and Technologies or Business Communication
and Technologies [Business Information Management I or
Business Information Management II]; it is a recommended corequisite
course[,] and may not be offered as a stand-alone course.
Students implement personal and interpersonal skills to strengthen
individual performance in the workplace and in society and to make
a successful transition to the workforce or postsecondary education.
Students apply technical skills to address business applications of
emerging technologies. Students develop a foundation in the economic
[economical], financial, technological, international,
social, and ethical aspects of business to become competent consumers,
employees, and entrepreneurs. Students enhance reading, writing, computing,
communication, and reasoning skills and apply them to the business
environment. Students incorporate a broad base of knowledge that includes
the legal, managerial, marketing, financial, ethical, and international
dimensions of business to make appropriate business decisions.
(4) - (5) (No change.)
(c) (No change.)
§130.143.Practicum in Business Management (Two Credits), Adopted 2015.
(a) General requirements. This course is recommended
for students in Grades 11 and 12. Recommended prerequisites: Touch
System Data Entry and Business Management or Business Communication
and Technologies [Business Information Management II].
Students shall be awarded two credits for successful completion of
this course. A student may repeat this course once for credit provided
that the student is experiencing different aspects of the industry
and demonstrating proficiency in additional and more advanced knowledge
and skills.
(b) - (c) (No change.)
§130.144.Extended Practicum in Business Management (One Credit), Adopted 2015.
(a) General requirements. This course is recommended
for students in Grades 11 and 12. The practicum course is a paid or
unpaid capstone experience for students participating in a coherent
sequence of career and technical education courses in the Business
Management and Administration Career Cluster. Recommended prerequisites:
Touch System Data Entry and Business Management or Business Communication
and Technologies [Business Information Management II].
Corequisite: Practicum in Business Management. This course must be
taken concurrently with Practicum in Business Management and may not
be taken as a stand-alone course. Students shall be awarded one credit
for successful completion of this course. A student may repeat this
course once for credit provided that the student is experiencing different
aspects of the industry and demonstrating proficiency in additional
and more advanced knowledge and skills.
(b) - (c) (No change.)
The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 22, 2024.
TRD-202403219
Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez
Director, Rulemaking
Texas Education Agency
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 1, 2024
For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497
STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The amendments are proposed under Texas Education Code (TEC), §7.102(c)(4), which requires the State Board of Education (SBOE) to establish curriculum and graduation requirements; TEC, §28.002(a), which identifies the subjects of the required curriculum; and TEC, §28.002(c), requires the SBOE to identify by rule the essential knowledge and skills of each subject in the required curriculum that all students should be able to demonstrate and that will be used in evaluating instructional materials and addressed on the state assessment instruments.
CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE. The amendments implements Texas Education Code, §7.102(c)(4) and §28.002(a) and (c).
§130.445.Introduction to Small Engine Technology [I] (One Credit), Adopted 2015.
(a) (No change.)
(b) Introduction.
(1) - (2) (No change.)
(3) Introduction to Small Engine Technology
[I] includes knowledge of the function and maintenance
of the systems and components of all types of small engines such as
outdoor power equipment, motorcycles, generators, and irrigation engines.
This course is designed to provide training for employment in the
small engine technology industry. Instruction includes the repair
and service of cooling, air, fuel, lubricating, electrical, ignition,
and mechanical systems. In addition, the student will receive instruction
in safety, academic, and leadership skills as well as career opportunities.
(4) - (5) (No change.)
(c) (No change.)
§130.446.Small Engine Technology [II]
(Two Credits), Adopted 2015.
(a) General requirements. This course is recommended
for students in Grades 10-12. Prerequisite: Introduction to Small
Engine Technology [I]. Students shall be awarded two credits
for successful completion of this course.
(b) Introduction.
(1) - (2) (No change.)
(3) Small Engine Technology [II] includes
advanced knowledge of the function, diagnosis, and service of the
systems and components of all types of small engines such as outdoor
power equipment, motorcycles, generators, and irrigation engines.
This course is designed to provide hands-on and practical application
for employment in the small engine technology industry. Instruction
includes the repair and service of cooling, air, fuel, lubricating,
electrical, ignition, and mechanical systems and small engine overhauls.
In addition, students will receive instruction in safety, academic,
and leadership skills as well as career opportunities.
(4) - (5) (No change.)
(c) (No change.)
The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 22, 2024.
TRD-202403220
Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez
Director, Rulemaking
Texas Education Agency
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 1, 2024
For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497